Manhattan Beach Logo
File #: 22-0341    Version: 1
Type: Consent - Staff Report Status: Agenda Ready
In control: City Council Regular Meeting
On agenda: 8/16/2022 Final action:
Title: Consideration of: (1) Adopt a Resolution Nunc Pro Tunc Approving a Three-Year Crossing Guard Services Contract with All City Management Services in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $1,495,000; and (2) As a Contingency, Authorize the City Manager to Enter into a Separate Agreement to Prevent any Gap in Service (City Attorney Barrow). ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 22-0122
Attachments: 1. Resolution Nunc Pro Tunc No. 22-0122, 2. Agreement - All City Management Services, 3. RFP #1276-22 Bid Comparison for Crossing Guard Services
TO:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

THROUGH:
Bruce Moe, City Manager

FROM:
Quinn M. Barrow, City Attorney

SUBJECT:Title
Consideration of:
(1) Adopt a Resolution Nunc Pro Tunc Approving a Three-Year Crossing Guard Services Contract with All City Management Services in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $1,495,000; and
(2) As a Contingency, Authorize the City Manager to Enter into a Separate Agreement to Prevent any Gap in Service (City Attorney Barrow).
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 22-0122
Line
_________________________________________________________
Recommended Action
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council (1): adopt Resolution Nunc Pro Tunc No. 22-0122 awarding RFP # 1276-22 to All City Management Services for a three-year contract to provide crossing guard services (with two-year extension option) in an amount not-to-exceed $1,495,000; and (2) as a contingency, authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement to prevent any gap in service.
Body
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
Sufficient funds are budgeted in Fiscal Year 2022-2023. Future years will be budgeted accordingly for this service.

BACKGROUND:
On August 2, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-0112 awarding RFP # 1276-22 to All City Management Services for a three-year contract to provide crossing guard services (with extension options totaling two years) in an amount not-to-exceed $1,495,000. Due to a clerical error, the wrong contract was included in the staff report. The draft contract included in the August 2 agenda contained modified indemnity language, significantly different from the City's standard indemnity language, which All City Management Services agreed to in the initial contract executed by both parties in 2017. Attached to this staff report is the correct contract, which contains the exact indemnity language contained in the 2017 contract. In addition, to prevent any gap in crossing guard services, staff is requesting that the Council authorize the Cit...

Click here for full text