Manhattan Beach Logo
File #: 22-0253    Version: 1
Type: Gen. Bus. - Staff Report Status: Agenda Ready
In control: City Council Regular Meeting
On agenda: 6/7/2022 Final action:
Title: Review of Prior City Council Requested Future Agenda Items (City Manager Moe). (Estimated Time: 15 Min.) DISCUSS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION
Attachments: 1. Prior City Council Requests for Future Agenda Items
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsDetailsVideo
No records to display.

TO:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

 

THROUGH:

Bruce Moe, City Manager

 

FROM:

Carrie Tai, AICP, Community Development Director

                     

SUBJECT:Title

Review of Prior City Council Requested Future Agenda Items (City Manager Moe).

(Estimated Time: 15 Min.)

DISCUSS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION

Line

_________________________________________________________

Recommended Action

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council discuss and provide direction on prior City Council requested future agenda items.

Body
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications associated with the recommended action.

 

BACKGROUND:

Over the past several years, the City Council has requested items for placement on a future agenda. Generally, staff presented items as soon as it is practical; however, there are requests that remain outstanding due to reprioritization or more significantly, disruptions like the COVID-19 pandemic response. 


DISCUSSION:

There continue to be items needing placement on a future agenda.  Staff requests that the City Council review the attached list and advise as to whether the items should remain on the list, and if desired, provide some general direction on prioritization. For items to remain on the list, staff will diligently place these items on a future agenda.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The City has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary.


LEGAL REVIEW:
The City Attorney has reviewed this report and determined that no additional legal analysis is necessary.

 

ATTACHMENT:

1. Prior City Council Requests for Future Agenda Items