TO:
Board of Directors of the Manhattan Beach Capital Improvements Corporation
THROUGH:
Talyn Mirzakhanian, Acting Chief Administrative Officer
FROM:
Onyx Jones, Interim Chief Financial Officer
SUBJECT:Title
Reorganization of the Manhattan Beach Capital Improvements Corporation (Interim Chief Financial Officer Jones).
ELECT A NEW PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT
Line
_________________________________________________________
Recommended Action
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Directors of the Manhattan Beach Capital Improvements Corporation (CIC) elect a new President and a new Vice President.
Body
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
There are no fiscal implications associated with the recommended action.
BACKGROUND:
The Manhattan Beach CIC was formed in 1996 to facilitate issuance of debt for improvements to the water and wastewater system. It has been used since then as the conduit for multiple debt issues including the Police/Fire Facility, Metlox improvements, Marine Sports Fields, and Fire Station No. 2.
DISCUSSION:
The bylaws of the Corporation state that the President and Vice President of the Corporation must be elected from the members of the City Council. Typically, the current Mayor serves as the President, with the Mayor Pro Tem serving as the Vice President. Appointed positions include the City Manager or Acting City Manager serving as the CIC’s Chief Administrative Officer or Acting Chief Administrative Officer, and the City’s Finance Director or Interim Finance Director serving as the Chief Financial Officer or Interim Chief Financial Officer. With the change of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem on the agenda for the October 15, 2024, City Council meeting, staff recommends that the CIC Board of Directors elect a new President and a new Vice President.
PUBLIC OUTREACH:
After analysis, staff determined that public outreach was not required for this issue.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary.
LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed this report and determined that no additional legal analysis is necessary.