Skip to main content
Manhattan Beach Logo
File #: ORD 16-0014    Version: 1
Type: Old Bus. - SR w/Ordinance Status: Agenda Ready
In control: City Council Regular Meeting
On agenda: 7/19/2016 Final action: 7/19/2016
Title: Consideration of Potential Election Date Change Alternatives to Meet the California Voter Participation Rights Act (California State Senate Bill 415) Requirements for the City of Manhattan Beach Including Introduction of Ordinance No. 16 0014 Changing the City's Election Date and Extending Current Elected Officials Terms by Eight Months (City Clerk Tamura). DISCUSS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION; WAIVE FURTHER READING AND INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. 16-0014
Attachments: 1. Ordinance No. 16-0014, 2. Advertisements in June 23, 2016, June 30, 2016, and July 14, 2016 Editions of the, 3. Open City Hall Forum Responses, 4. PowerPoint Presentation from June 7, 2016 City Council Meeting, 5. Public Comment - Tim Lilligren, 6. Public Comment - Jan Dennis
Related files: ORD 16-0026

TO:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

 

THROUGH:

Mark Danaj, City Manager

 

FROM:

Liza Tamura, City Clerk
Quinn Barrow, City Attorney

Matthew Cuevas, Management Analyst

                     

SUBJECT:Title

Consideration of Potential Election Date Change Alternatives to Meet the California Voter Participation Rights Act (California State Senate Bill 415) Requirements for the City of Manhattan Beach Including Introduction of Ordinance No. 16 0014 Changing the City’s Election Date and Extending Current Elected Officials Terms by Eight Months (City Clerk Tamura).

DISCUSS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION; WAIVE FURTHER READING AND INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. 16-0014

Line

_________________________________________________________

Recommended Action

EXPLANATION FOR REVISED STAFF REPORT - POSTED ON FRIDAY, JULY 15, 2016

The staff report posted on Wednesday, July 13, 2016, incorrectly stated that the date intervals for the current terms for the City’s elected officials would be extended “one year” instead of the correct “eight months”. This revised version corrects this error and also provides the following link to SB 415 (<http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB415>) for City Council and public review. Please disregard the previous version of this staff report.

RECOMMENDATION:

Council consideration of waiving further reading and introducing Ordinance No. 16 0014, which would change the City’s election date from March 2017 to November 2017 and would extend the current terms of the City’s elected officials by eight months. The City Council may also consider other potential election date change alternatives for future municipal elections for the City of Manhattan Beach.

Body

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The fiscal implications associated with the passage of this new state legislation will impact the City’s finances when it conducts its municipal election. On average, for the past five municipal elections, the City Clerk’s office has budgeted approximately $73,735 to conduct the municipal election every other odd numbered year in March. City staff will utilize this amount as a baseline for future budgeting of municipal elections with relevant cost increases factored into future years to account for supplies, postage and election materials.

 

BACKGROUND:

At the June 7, 2016 Regular City Council meeting, City Council directed staff to prepare a draft resolution to change the next election date from March 2017 to November 2017, as a first step in complying with SB 415 requirements. In conducting the research for the proposed resolution, it was determined that an ordinance is necessary to facilitate the legal change of election dates.  

 

The California Voter Participation Rights Act (SB 415) was passed on September 1, 2015. This new legislation prohibits a local government from holding an election on any date other than a statewide election date if doing so in the past has resulted in a significant decrease in voter turnout. This new law will go into effect on January 1, 2018. SB 415 requires cities with insufficient voter turnout, prior to January 1, 2018, to adopt a plan to consolidate its election with the statewide election no later than the November 8, 2022 statewide general election.   

DISCUSSION:

As noted above, at the June 7, 2016 Regular City Council meeting, City Council directed staff to prepare a draft resolution to change the next election date from March 2017 to November 2017.  The attached draft ordinance is the first step of Option 2, which was chosen by the City Council at the June 7, 2016 Regular City Council meeting. (The previous staff report and subsequent options from the June 7, 2016 meeting can be reviewed through this link <<https://manhattanbeach.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2740290&GUID=485BA709-A505-4604-99D0-1A8680E00C0C>>). Option 2 calls for extending current elected City officials’ terms in a two step process. The attached draft ordinance is the first step in proceeding with Option 2 and would extend current elected officials terms by eight months. This ordinance would extend three current City Councilmember terms from March 2017 to November 2017, and two current City Councilmember terms from March 2019 to November 2019.

 

As reported in the staff report for the June 7, 2016, City Council meeting, Elections Code Section 10403.5(b) requires that “no term of office shall be increased or decreased by more than 12 months …” which limits the options available to Manhattan Beach in complying with SB 415.  Typically, when faced with changes in state law addressing election dates, cities will increase terms, rather than decrease terms.  However, here, the City’s regular election is in March of odd years, which means that any term increase to June or November of the following even year exceeds the 12 month cap imposed by Elections Code Section 10403.5(b). Thus, the City would need to conduct stand alone municipal elections in November 2017 and November 2019. The terms of office would then run from November 2017 to November 2021, and from November 2019 to November 2023 respectively.

 

If City Council decides to adopt Ordinance No. 16 0014, staff would move forward with step two of the process prior to January 1, 2018. SB 415 requires that the City enact a plan so that the City’s municipal election is consolidated with statewide general elections held in either June or November of even numbered years. In addition to considering Ordinance No. 16 0014, the City Council may also weigh other options available for changing the City’s future municipal election date.

 

As previously reported, the City can satisfy the requirements of SB 415, in a number of different ways, including the options below:

 

Option 1: Decrease the term starting in March 2017 by four months (March of an odd year, to the prior November of an even year). Decreasing the term for the March 2019 election by four months would also comply with SB 415’s requirement that the City consolidate its election with a statewide election prior to November 2022. In either case the election would be held in November 2022.

Option 2: Step 1: Extend current elected City officials’ terms to November of 2017, and conduct a municipal election in November 2017. Step 2: This would also require a second change to the election date to June or November of an even year. 

Option 3: Wait until the end of 2017 to see if the State Legislature will change SB 415.  As part of this option, the Council may want to pursue joining in a possible petition effort.  

 

PUBLIC OUTREACH/INTEREST:
In accordance with City Council direction from the June 7, 2016 City Council meeting, staff placed a half page advertisement in the June 23, 2016; June 30, 2016, and a quarter page ad in the July 14, 2016 editions of the Beach Reporter. City staff also distributed notices through the City’s social media platforms including Twitter and Facebook, as well as two e notifications to 805 subscribers. In addition, an online topic was also created on the City’s Open City Hall forum to gather additional input from the community. At the time the agenda packet was assembled, the Open City Hall topic garnered 59 visitors and 12 responses which is equal to 36 minutes of public comment (attached).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The City has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary.


LEGAL REVIEW:
The City Attorney has reviewed the draft ordinance and “Approved as to Form.” In the event the City Council does not introduce this ordinance, the City Attorney and City Clerk will collaborate to accomplish the direction provided by City Council to ensure the City will be in full compliance with this new legislation as follows:

 

                     The City will enact a plan by January 1, 2018, to hold the City’s municipal election in either June or November of even-numbered years by November 2022.

 


Attachments:
1. Ordinance No. 16-0014
2. Advertisements in June 23, 2016, June 30, 2016, and July 14, 2016 Editions of the
    Beach Reporter

3. Open City Hall Forum Responses
4. PowerPoint Presentation from June 7, 2016 City Council Meeting

5. Public Comment - Tim Lilligren

6. Public Comment - Jan Dennis