Skip to main content
Manhattan Beach Logo
File #: 16-0141    Version: 1
Type: Planning Comm. Decisions - Staff Report Status: Agenda Ready
In control: City Council Regular Meeting
On agenda: 4/5/2016 Final action:
Title: Planning Commission Approval of a Variance for Construction of a New Single Family Residence with a Reduced Front Yard Setback and Reduced Supplemental Second Story Setback at 3017 Elm Avenue (Community Development Director Lundstedt). BY ORDER OF THE CHAIR, RECEIVE AND FILE
Attachments: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. PC 16-01, 2. Planning Commission Staff Report and Attachments - March 23, 2016
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsDetailsVideo
No records to display.

TO:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

 

THROUGH:

Mark Danaj, City Manager

 

FROM:

Marisa Lundstedt, Community Development Director

Laurie B. Jester, Planning Manager

Ted Faturos, Assistant Planner

                     

SUBJECT:Title

Planning Commission Approval of a Variance for Construction of a New Single Family Residence with a Reduced Front Yard Setback and Reduced Supplemental Second Story Setback at 3017 Elm Avenue (Community Development Director Lundstedt).

BY ORDER OF THE CHAIR, RECEIVE AND FILE

Line

_________________________________________________________

Recommended Action

RECOMMENDATION:

By order of the Chair, receive and file this report.

Body

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

After a duly noticed public hearing on March 23, 2016, the Planning Commission approved a request for a Variance for 3017 Elm Avenue. The project proposes to demolish the existing nonconforming home on a triangular shaped lot and construct a new 2,420 square foot two-story single family residence that will have a reduced front yard setback in addition to a reduced supplemental second story setback. The proposed new structure will conform to all other code requirements.

 

In accordance with Ordinance 15-0015 adopted June 16, 2015, any Councilmember may request review of a Planning Commission decision within twenty days (April 12, 2016) following the decision. For all requests for review, it shall be presumed that the reason for the request is that the decision may have significant and material effects on the quality of life within the City, or that the subject matter of the decision may have City-wide importance warranting review and determination by City’s elected officials. Bias shall not be presumed or inferred due to a request for review.

 

If no Councilmember requests that the decision be reviewed, the Mayor will receive and file the report by order of the Chair. 

 

Attachments:

1.  Planning Commission Resolution No. PC 16-01

2.  Planning Commission Staff Report and Attachments - March 23, 2016

3.  Planning Commission Draft Minutes - March 23, 2016